Opinion
2:22-cv-00459-ART-DJA
04-20-2022
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM SAMANTHA A. MARTIN, ESQ Attorneys for Plaintiff BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL MICHAEL C. MILLS, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants Samuel Wingard, Rush Truck Leasing, and Attorneys for Plaintiff Heaven on Earth Moving Services
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM SAMANTHA A. MARTIN, ESQ Attorneys for Plaintiff
BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL MICHAEL C. MILLS, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants Samuel Wingard, Rush Truck Leasing, and Attorneys for Plaintiff Heaven on Earth Moving Services
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT RUSH TRUCK LEASING MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P 12(B)(6)
ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Pursuant to Local Rule (“LR”) IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff TERESITA VELASQUEZ (“Plaintiff'), by and through her counsel of record SAMANTHA A. MARTIN, ESQ of RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, and Defendant RUSH TRUCK LEASING (“Defendant”) by and through its counsel of record, MICHAEL C. MILLS, ESQ. of BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL, PLLC LLP, hereby request and stipulate that Plaintiff be allowed a ten (10) day extension of time, up to and including April 29, 2022 to file with the Court, Plaintiffs' response to Defendant Rush Truck Leasing's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(6) [ECF 9], The parties also stipulate and agree to allow Defendant up to and including May 6, 2022 to file their Reply.
This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time to extend the deadline to file their Response and Defendant Rush Truck Leasing's first request to extend the deadline for its Reply. This request is made in good faith and not intended for purposes of delay. The Parties request this extension in order further discuss the issues that are the subject of the Motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.