From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI c EDINBURG
Jun 5, 2017
NUMBER 13-16-00668-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2017)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00668-CR

06-05-2017

DEBRA JEAN VELASQUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

ORDER

Before Justices Contreras, Benavides, and Longoria
Order Per Curiam

Appellant's appointed counsel, Jacqueline Del Llano Chapa, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as counsel. According to her motion to withdraw, good cause exists for her to withdraw because she is now employed full time by the City of Corpus Christi and is unable to represent appellant.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant's court-appointed attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant's current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam Do Not Publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2. Delivered and filed this the 5th day of June, 2017.


Summaries of

Velasquez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI c EDINBURG
Jun 5, 2017
NUMBER 13-16-00668-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Velasquez v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA JEAN VELASQUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI c EDINBURG

Date published: Jun 5, 2017

Citations

NUMBER 13-16-00668-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2017)