From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. Robustelli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P

07-13-2016

DENICIO VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. J. ROBUSTELLI, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On May 31, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired and plaintiff has not complied with the court's May 31, 2016 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: July 13, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
vela1131.fifp


Summaries of

Velasquez v. Robustelli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Velasquez v. Robustelli

Case Details

Full title:DENICIO VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. J. ROBUSTELLI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2016)