From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. Hama N.Y. Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 16, 2022
21 Civ. 3218 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 3218 (ER)

05-16-2022

RICARDO VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. HAMA NEW YORK INC., SUSAN REBBAJ, and LOTFI REBBAJ, Defendants.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Velasquez v. Hama N.Y. Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 16, 2022
21 Civ. 3218 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Velasquez v. Hama N.Y. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. HAMA NEW YORK INC., SUSAN REBBAJ, and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 3218 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)