From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-05-2118 LKK CHS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2118 LKK CHS.

September 21, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner Velasquez, a state prisoner, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 26, 2009, this court granted the petition as to Velasquez's due process claim and entered judgment in his favor. Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court decided Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859 (2011), which foreclosed the claim on which relief was granted. Respondent successfully appealed and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has reversed this court's judgment in accordance with Swarthout. The Ninth Circuit's judgment was entered July 13, 2011 and took effect on August 4, 2011.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

2. Because the Ninth Circuit's mandate forecloses Petitioner's constitutional claim, a Certificate of Appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Velasquez v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-05-2118 LKK CHS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Velasquez v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:DAVID VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2118 LKK CHS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)