Opinion
Civil Action No. 12 1987
12-12-2012
PERFECTO VELASCO Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.
Plaintiff alleges that the Department of Veterans Affairs has denied his many applications for medical benefits. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs "shall decide all questions of law and fact necessary to a decision by the Secretary under a law that affects the provision of benefits by the Secretary to veterans or the dependents or survivors of veterans." 38 U.S.C. § 511(a). The Secretary's decision "as to any such question shall be final and conclusive and may not be reviewed by any other official or by any court[.]" Id. Therefore, this federal district court does not have jurisdiction over matters relating to veterans benefits. See Price v. United States, 228 F.3d 420, 421-22 (D.C. Cir. 2000) ("As amended by the Veterans Judicial Review Act..., the Veterans' Benefits Act of 1957 . . . precludes judicial review in Article III courts of VA decisions affecting the provision of veterans' benefits") (per curiam), cert, denied, 534 U.S. 903 (2001); see Jones v Nicholson, No. 1:07-CV-165, 2011 WL 2160918 (M.D. Ga. June 1, 2011) (dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction veteran's claim for benefits); Peavey v. Holder, 657 F. Supp. 2d 180 (D.D.C. 2009) (dismissing challenge to VA's decisions on claim for benefits notwithstanding veteran's "attempts to avoid application of § 511 by labeling his claims as constitutional claims").
The Court will dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter. An Order is issued separately.
_______________
United States District Judge