From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velardi v. Lerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because plaintiff's mechanic's lien had expired, Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's first cause of action to foreclose that lien. Supreme Court properly denied, however, defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's causes of action for breach of contract and quantum meruit because, accepting as true the evidence presented by plaintiff, there is at least arguably a triable issue (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 A.D.2d 845, appeal dismissed 65 N.Y.2d 637). Supreme Court's order is modified, therefore, to grant in part defendants' motion for summary judgment by dismissing plaintiff's first cause of action.


Summaries of

Velardi v. Lerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Velardi v. Lerman

Case Details

Full title:CRISPINO VELARDI, Respondent, v. IRVING S. LERMAN, Also Known as STUART…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 1007

Citing Cases

John Mezzalingua A., Inc. v. Walker

Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion. There are triable issues of fact concerning whether…

Apple v. Apple

The appeal from the first order must be dismissed because that order was superseded by the order granting…