From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veit v. Eastman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 11, 1993
856 S.W.2d 72 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 61264.

May 11, 1993.

APPEAL FROM ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; HON. STEPHEN WILLCOX, JUDGE.

William James O'Herin, Florissant, for appellant.

Michael Allen Campbell, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and SMITH and STEPHAN, JJ.


ORDER


Appellant, Bruce Eastman, appeals entry of a partial summary judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, in favor of respondent, Richard R. Veit, on his claim for unlawful detainer. We affirm. We also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We therefore affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Veit v. Eastman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 11, 1993
856 S.W.2d 72 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Veit v. Eastman

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD R. VEIT, RESPONDENT, v. BRUCE EASTMAN, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 11, 1993

Citations

856 S.W.2d 72 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)