From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vega v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 26, 2019
No. 16 CV 1190-LTS-DCF (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 16 CV 1190-LTS-DCF

07-26-2019

JESUS VEGA, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman's June 11, 2019, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 25) which recommends that pro se Petitioner Jesus Vega's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket entry no. 2) be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report have been received.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2017). "In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00 Civ. 8117, 2003 WL 21433443, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Freeman's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed. The Court also adopts Judge Freeman's recommendation that the Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1)(A) because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability should not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Middleton v. Attorneys General of States of N.Y. & Pennsylvania, 396 F.3d 207, 209 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 (1962). This Order resolves docket entry no. 2. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter judgment accordingly.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

July 26, 2019

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge Copies mailed to: Jesus Vega
12-A-1245
Southport Correction Facility
P.O. Box 2000
Pine City, NY 14871-2000 Jesus Vega
12-A-1245
1156 Rt. 374
Dannemora, NY 12929


Summaries of

Vega v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 26, 2019
No. 16 CV 1190-LTS-DCF (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Vega v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:JESUS VEGA, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 26, 2019

Citations

No. 16 CV 1190-LTS-DCF (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2019)