From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vega v. Beacon 109 207-209 LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 23, 2020
179 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

1083 Index 156296/13

01-23-2020

Michael VEGA, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BEACON 109 207–209 LLC, Defendant–Respondent. Beacon 109 207–209 LLC, Third–Party Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Amaco Management and Consulting, Inc., Third–Party Defendant.

Law Office of Charles E. Finelli & Associates, PLLC, Bronx (David Gordon of counsel), for appellant. Melcer Newman, PLLC, New York (Fabio A. Gomez of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of Charles E. Finelli & Associates, PLLC, Bronx (David Gordon of counsel), for appellant.

Melcer Newman, PLLC, New York (Fabio A. Gomez of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kern, Oing, Gonza´lez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered August 13, 2018, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to dismiss the complaint based on a clear showing that plaintiff had repeatedly failed to comply with multiple discovery orders, which was "dilatory, evasive, obstructive and ultimately contumacious" ( CDR Cre´ances S.A.S v. Cohen , 23 N.Y.3d 307, 318, 991 N.Y.S.2d 519, 15 N.E.3d 274 [2014] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Willfulness may be inferred when a party repeatedly fails to respond to discovery demands and/or comply with discovery orders, coupled with inadequate excuses (see International Brain Research Found., Inc. v. Cavalier , 158 A.D.3d 464, 465, 72 N.Y.S.3d 38 [1st Dept. 2018], lv dismissed 32 N.Y.3d 1074, 89 N.Y.S.3d 104, 113 N.E.3d 938 [2018] ), and while plaintiff may have ultimately provided the requested document discovery, he unduly delayed the progress of the action and failed to appear for a court-ordered deposition despite several adjournments. Furthermore, the court provided him with many opportunities to comply with its discovery orders and, despite three years of effort, plaintiff still did not met those obligations (see Kihl v. Pfeffer , 94 N.Y.2d 118, 122, 700 N.Y.S.2d 87, 722 N.E.2d 55 [1999] ).


Summaries of

Vega v. Beacon 109 207-209 LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 23, 2020
179 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Vega v. Beacon 109 207-209 LLC

Case Details

Full title:Michael Vega, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beacon 109 207-209 LLC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 23, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 484
114 N.Y.S.3d 638

Citing Cases

Lopez v. Bronx Ford, Inc.

Indeed, on appeal, plaintiff contends that only the records for defendant City World Motors, LLC's (Motors)…