From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vega v. 103 Thayer Street, LLC

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jul 1, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4882 (N.Y. 2014)

Opinion

07-01-2014

Ana VEGA, Respondent, v. 103 THAYER STREET, LLC, Defendant, City of New York, Appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Susan Paulson of counsel), for appellant. Levine & Wiss, PLLC, Mineola (Anthony A. Ferrante of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Susan Paulson of counsel), for appellant.

Levine & Wiss, PLLC, Mineola (Anthony A. Ferrante of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, and certified question answered in the negative. The City was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The markings on the Big Apple Map failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the City had prior written notice of the alleged defect. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.


Summaries of

Vega v. 103 Thayer Street, LLC

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jul 1, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4882 (N.Y. 2014)
Case details for

Vega v. 103 Thayer Street, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Ana VEGA, Respondent, v. 103 THAYER STREET, LLC, Defendant, City of New…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jul 1, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4882 (N.Y. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4882
23 N.Y.3d 1027
992 N.Y.S.2d 776

Citing Cases

Foley v. City of N.Y.

I would find that the trial court properly set aside the verdict against the City for lack of legally…

Falkovich v. City of New York

A review of the Big Apple Maps submitted shows no markings in the area—that is, the intersection of Pearl…