From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veasey v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2020
No. 1D19-1921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-1921

01-29-2020

TONY L. VEASEY II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
W. Joel Boles, Judge.

In this appeal taken pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, finding that the judgment and sentence document erroneously states that Appellant admitted to violating "all conditions" of his probation, we remand solely for correction of the judgment and sentence to reflect that Appellant admitted only to violating his probation for not completing the Teen Challenge program.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of judgment and sentence. OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Summaries of

Veasey v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2020
No. 1D19-1921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Veasey v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY L. VEASEY II, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 29, 2020

Citations

No. 1D19-1921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2020)