From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VB Management, Inc. v. AD 1619 Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 84 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.).


Although the lease provides for a 12-day cure period, it also provides for an unspecified longer period to cure for defaults not capable of complete cure within 12 days, upon condition that the tenant commence curing within the 12-day period and thereafter proceed with good faith and diligence. We agree with the IAS Court that no issue of fact exists as to plaintiff's compliance with this good faith/diligence requirement, and also agree that plaintiff has cured the alleged default by bringing itself into compliance with all the insurance provisions of the lease. However, the portion of the order requiring defendant to obtain court approval before serving any future notices to cure is overbroad to the extent it enjoins defendant from terminating the lease on grounds not set forth in prior notices to cure ( see, Manhattan Parking Sys.-Serv. Corp. v. Murray House Owners Corp., 211 A.D.2d 534, 536), and we modify accordingly.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

VB Management, Inc. v. AD 1619 Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 84 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

VB Management, Inc. v. AD 1619 Co.

Case Details

Full title:VB MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent, v. AD 1619 COMPANY, L. L. C., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 84 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 257

Citing Cases

VB MANAGEMENT, INC. v. AD 1619 COMPANY, LLC

Decided June 8, 1999 Appeal from (1st Dept: 256 A.D.2d 84). Motion for leave to appeal granted or…

Becker Parkin Dent. v. 450 Westside

We reject defendant landlord's argument that the tenant is not entitled to a Yellowstone injunction because…