From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vazquez v. California Highway Patrol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2015
Case No.: 15-cv-330 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

Summary

stating that sovereign citizens "generally contend that most if not all of the state and federal government, statutory structure, and legal system is invalid or illegitimate, or at least that individuals can essentially opt out of the rules of society through convoluted legalistic loopholes"

Summary of this case from In re Dominick

Opinion

Case No.: 15-cv-330 YGR

04-06-2015

R. IVANNE VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL; AND TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff R. Ivanne Vazquez filed his complaint here on January 23, 2015, alleging claims against the California Highway Patrol and the Sutter County Sheriff. At that same time he filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 2.)

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero issued his Report and Recommendation ("the Report") in this matter on March 2, 2015. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff R. Ivanne Vazquez filed his objections to the Report on March 19, 2015. (Dkt. No. 10.) The Court has reviewed the Report and the objections carefully. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopts it in every respect.

Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Report, the claims against Defendant California Highway Patrol are DISMISSED without leave to amend based upon Eleventh Amendment immunity. The remaining claims are TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 6, 2015

/s/_________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vazquez v. California Highway Patrol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 6, 2015
Case No.: 15-cv-330 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

stating that sovereign citizens "generally contend that most if not all of the state and federal government, statutory structure, and legal system is invalid or illegitimate, or at least that individuals can essentially opt out of the rules of society through convoluted legalistic loopholes"

Summary of this case from In re Dominick
Case details for

Vazquez v. California Highway Patrol

Case Details

Full title:R. IVANNE VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 6, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 15-cv-330 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Dominick

[Docket No. 1 ("Petition").] Under a sovereign citizen theory, U.S. citizenship is contractual and therefore…