ECF No. 30 at 25 (quoting Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp., 4 F.3d 1153, 1191 (3d Cir.1993)). See also Vavro v. Albers, No. 2:05CV321, 2006 WL 2547350, at *28 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2006) aff'd sub nom. Vavro v. A.K. Steel Co., 254 Fed.Appx. 134 (3d Cir. 2007).
Indeed the Supreme Court has declared that Congress's limitation of recovery to business or property injury 'retains restrictive significance. It would for example exclude personal injuries suffered.'" Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp., 937 F.2d 899, 918 (3d Cir. 1991) (quoting Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 339 (1979)); see also Vavro v. Albers, No. Civ.A.05-321, 2006 WL 2547350, at *21 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2006) (noting that personal injuries, physical pain, mental distress, and financial injuries that derive therefrom, are not compensable under RICO), aff'd, 254 F. App'x 134 (3d Cir. 2007). Moreover, injury to "valuable intangible property" is normally not the type of property which is capable of incurring a concrete financial loss. Anderson v. Ayling, 396 F.3d 265, 271 (3d Cir. 2005) (quoting Steele v. Hosp. Corp. of Am., 36 F.3d 69, 70 (9th Cir. 1994)).