From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaught v. Sandoval

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1558-KJM-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1558-KJM-KJN-P.

September 8, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 31, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court thus presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2011, are adopted in full.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss and to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status (ECF 32) is denied.

DATED: September 7, 2011.


Summaries of

Vaught v. Sandoval

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1558-KJM-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Vaught v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV, Plaintiff, v. E. SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1558-KJM-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)