From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaught v. Miranda

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1108 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1108 DAD P.

September 19, 2011


ORDER


On September 2, 2011, counsel for defendants filed a request seeking clarification of the court's April 7, 2011 discovery and scheduling order. Specifically, defendants seek clarification of the court's order that requires "[a]ll pre-trial motions, except for motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before September 30, 2011." (Order (Doc. No. 29), ¶ 7 at 6.) Defendants note that they have already filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and ask if "pre-trial motions" referred to in the scheduling order includes motions in limine.

The court's discovery and scheduling order does not set a deadline for the filing of motions in limine. A deadline for the filing of motions in limine, if necessary, will be set in this court's pretrial order. Defendants' cross-motion is a dispositive motion and was timely filed.

Accordingly, defendants' September 2, 2011 request for clarification (Doc. No. 41) is granted.


Summaries of

Vaught v. Miranda

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1108 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Vaught v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, Plaintiff, v. B. MIRANDA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1108 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)