From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaught v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-3422 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3422 MCE CKD P

04-13-2012

ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV, Plaintiff, v. D. CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. On March 29, 2012, the district judge assigned to this case adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full and partially denied defendants' motion to dismiss. Therefore, defendants shall file a responsive pleading to plaintiff's remaining claims within fourteen days of the filed date of this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants have fourteen days from the entry of this order in which to file a responsive pleading.

____________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Vaught v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-3422 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Vaught v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV, Plaintiff, v. D. CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3422 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2012)