Vaughn v. Shinseki

2 Citing cases

  1. Vaughn v. Shinseki

    464 F. App'x 874 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

    Over the next 18 years, Mr. Vaughn made several filings with the RO, the Board of Veterans Appeals ("Board"), and this court, attempting to revise the 1992 ratings decision through various means, including petitions for writs of mandamus. See Vaughn v. Shinseki, 403 Fed. Appx. 514 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 2, 2010) (dismissing appeal from denial of petition for writ of mandamus); Vaughn v. Shinseki, 2010 WL 1805365 (Vet. App. May 6, 2010) (denying mandamus relief); Vaughn v. Principi, 2004 WL 1302469 (Vet. App. May 25, 2004) (same); Vaughn v. West, 2000 WL 920249 (Vet. App. June 22, 2000) (same). As it relates to the current appeal, in 2010 Mr. Vaughn asserted clear and unmistakable error ("CUE") in the 1992 ratings decision, which the RO rejected.

  2. Williams v. McDonald

    614 F. App'x 499 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

    These concerns are outside of our jurisdiction in this case. See, e.g., Vaughn v. Shinseki, 403 F. App'x 514, 516 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (stating that the petitioner's constitutional arguments "do not relate to the Veterans Court's decision denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, the only decision before us for review, but rather to the procedures established by statute and regulation for adjudicating claims at the RO and the Board. Because [petitioner] has not raised any issues regarding the decision of the Veterans Court that are within our jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.").