From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Lapin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Jul 11, 2012
DOCKET NO. 11-CV-923 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 11-CV-923

07-11-2012

TARIQ A. VAUGHN, SR. v. HARVEY LAPIN, ET AL.


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, including the objections filed by Plaintiff, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous because it is prescribed on it's face and, alternatively, for failing to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2) (3).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 11th day of July, 2012.

_______________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Lapin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P
Jul 11, 2012
DOCKET NO. 11-CV-923 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Lapin

Case Details

Full title:TARIQ A. VAUGHN, SR. v. HARVEY LAPIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SEC. P

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

DOCKET NO. 11-CV-923 (W.D. La. Jul. 11, 2012)