From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Klamath Cnty. Fire Dist. No.1

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 29, 2022
Civ. 1:22-cv-00161-CL (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 1:22-cv-00161-CL

09-29-2022

RICHARD VAUGHN, JR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KLAMATH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Although Plaintiff did not file objections, I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is adopted. First Motion Against Plaintiff's Complaint (EFC No. 7) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claim of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendant Stephen R. Hedlund is dismissed. The parties have thirty days to consent to trial before a magistrate judge. If the parties do not consent, the case will be reassigned to Judge Michael J. McShane.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Klamath Cnty. Fire Dist. No.1

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 29, 2022
Civ. 1:22-cv-00161-CL (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Klamath Cnty. Fire Dist. No.1

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD VAUGHN, JR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KLAMATH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

Civ. 1:22-cv-00161-CL (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)