From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Hubert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2013
106 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-1

In the Matter of Wesley VAUGHN, petitioner, v. James W. HUBERT, etc., respondent.

Wesley Vaughn, Dannemora, N.Y., petitioner pro se. *880Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.


Wesley Vaughn, Dannemora, N.Y., petitioner pro se. *880Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent James W. Hubert, a Judge of the County Court, Westchester County, to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. 440.20, and 440.46, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic, and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the respondent's order dated January 8, 2013.

ENG, P.J., RIVERA, DICKERSON and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Hubert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2013
106 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Hubert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Wesley VAUGHN, petitioner, v. James W. HUBERT, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3104
963 N.Y.S.2d 879