From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughan v. Wann

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 6, 1987
502 So. 2d 760 (Ala. 1987)

Opinion

85-1181.

February 6, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Madison County, Thomas N. Younger, J.

J. Gary Pate of Najjar, Denaburg, Meyerson, Zarzaur, Max, Boyd Schwartz, Birmingham, for appellant.

Joe M. Berry and Thomas E. Parker, Jr., of Berry, Ables, Tatum, Little Baxter, Huntsville, for appellee.


This appeal results from a will contest. Appellant James W. Vaughan offered a document which he claimed to be the last will and testament of the deceased, Vida B. Wann. William B. Wann, the deceased's son, filed a suit contending that the document offered for probate by Vaughan was invalid, because it either was a forgery or was fraudulent. The jury returned a verdict in favor of William B. Wann, finding that the will offered for probate by Vaughan was not the legal valid will of the deceased. Vaughan appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to the jury verdict.

Vaughan contends that he "met the statutory and case law requirements for proving a valid will and [that] there was insufficient evidence to overcome the prima facie case established by him."

The only way to preserve the question of the sufficiency or weight of the evidence for review on appeal is to raise it in a motion for new trial. State v. Long, 344 So.2d 754 (Ala. 1977); Francis v. Tucker, 341 So.2d 710 (Ala. 1977). Vaughan failed to make a motion for a new trial; therefore, nothing is presented for review.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vaughan v. Wann

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 6, 1987
502 So. 2d 760 (Ala. 1987)
Case details for

Vaughan v. Wann

Case Details

Full title:James W. VAUGHAN v. William B. WANN, Executor of the Estate of Vida B…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 6, 1987

Citations

502 So. 2d 760 (Ala. 1987)

Citing Cases

Spiers v. Flowers

However, the plaintiff did not preserve this issue on appeal by filing a motion for a directed verdict or a…

S W Properties v. American Motorists Ins. Co.

In addition, we agree with S W that American Motorists failed to preserve this issue for review by failing…