From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughan v. B B Supermarket, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1972
39 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

May 25, 1972

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff sought damages from third-party plaintiff B B Supermarket, Inc., and Henry Gianadda and Peter J. Casarsa, doing business as Henter Construction Co. for injuries resulting from a fall on a sidewalk in front of third-party plaintiff's supermarket. The complaint alleged a defectively constructed or repaired sidewalk which caused plaintiff's injuries. It alleged that defendant Henter Construction Company constructed and repaired the sidewalk and third-party plaintiff owned or leased the supermarket and adjoining sidewalk. Third-party plaintiff cross-claimed against Henter Construction and served a third-party complaint against third-party defendant Walbiss, Inc., the owner of the supermarket and adjoining premises and S.M. Flickinger Co., Inc., the lessor of third-party plaintiff and lessee of third-party defendant Walbiss, Inc. The original complaint alleged that third-party plaintiff had either actual or constructive notice of the defective sidewalk. The third-party complaint alleged that third-party defendant had the responsibility to maintain the sidewalks which were owned and controlled by it and that it had actual notice of the defects alleged in the complaint. ¶ Special Term dismissed the third-party complaint upon the grounds that the original complaint alleged only active negligence against the third-party plaintiff and that the third-party plaintiff's complaint alleged that original plaintiff's injuries were caused solely by the third-party defendant's primary and active negligence. Since this is a simple common-law indemnity third-party action, the principles stated in the recent case of Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. ( 30 N.Y.2d 143) would apply so as to eliminate the active-passive dichotomy, leaving the apportionment of the relative responsibilities of third-party plaintiff and third-party defendant for determination upon the trial.


Summaries of

Vaughan v. B B Supermarket, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1972
39 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Vaughan v. B B Supermarket, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES VAUGHAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. B B SUPERMARKET, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 25, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Moreno v. Galdorisi

The principle enunciated was in no respect confined to a particular factual situation. Since the date of the…