From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2019
174 A.D.3d 1442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

443 CA 18–01031

07-31-2019

Nicholas L. VASSENELLI, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, et al., Defendants, Pomco Group, also known as Pomco, Inc., Individually and as an Agent for City of Syracuse, and Sharon Miller, in her Individual Capacity as a Former Agent of City of Syracuse, Defendants–Respondents. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. BARRER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.


BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT.

BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. BARRER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse ( [Appeal No. 1] 174 A.D.3d 1443, 103 N.Y.S.3d 328 [July 31, 2019] [4th Dept. 2019] ).


Summaries of

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2019
174 A.D.3d 1442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas L. VASSENELLI, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

174 A.D.3d 1442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
103 N.Y.S.3d 336