Opinion
No. 05-11-00682-CR
11-28-2012
FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Affirmed; Opinion Filed November 28, 2012.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F11-33493-Y
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang
Opinion by Justice Lang
A jury convicted Frank Vasquez of theft valued less than $1,500 enhanced by two prior theft convictions and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. ('rim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders eases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court's judgment.
______________________
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
110682F.U05
JUDGMENT
FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05-11 -00682-CR
Appeal from the Criminal District Court
No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F11-33493-Y).
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices
Moseley and Francis participating.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 28, 2012
______________________
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE