From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1938 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1938 DAD P.

October 15, 2008


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed September 4, 2008, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action;

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Vasquez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1938 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Vasquez v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1938 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)