From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1984
104 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

October 1, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, and complaint dismissed.

On March 4, 1981, at approximately 4:30 A.M., plaintiff Jose Vasquez was attacked by two men at the Van Sicklen Avenue subway station in Brooklyn. In a report given to police officers who responded to the scene, he claimed he was leaving the station when he was robbed, and then thrown down the stairs by his attackers.

The plaintiffs served a summons and complaint on the defendant which alleged, inter alia, that the token clerk observed the assault perpetrated on Mr. Vasquez but failed to assist him in any way.

In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff must show facts sufficient to require a trial (see Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065; Spearmon v Times Sq. Stores Corp., 96 A.D.2d 552). The assertions made by these plaintiffs in opposition to the motion are bare conclusory allegations which are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment ( Spearmon v Times Sq. Stores Corp., supra). Rubin, J.P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vasquez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1984
104 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Vasquez v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:JOSE E. VASQUEZ et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)