Vasquez v. Moghaddam

Full title: ANDREW VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. EILYA MOGHADDAM, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2023

2:19-cv-1283 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1283 AC P

01-10-2023

ANDREW VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. EILYA MOGHADDAM, et al., Defendants.

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 58. This is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. In support of the motion, plaintiff states that the location where he is housed has implemented COVID-19 restrictions. He also believes that filing a response to defendants' motion will be complex. Id.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED, and

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment.