From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-3141 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3141 GEB KJN P.

July 6, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On June 28, 2010, petitioner filed a joint status report pursuant to this court's June 7, 2010 order. Counsel for respondent was unavailable to confer regarding the statement as he is out of the office until July 12, 2010.

Good cause appearing, counsel for respondent will be directed to file a supplemental statement addressing the issues raised in the June 28, 2010 status report. The statement shall include a briefing schedule on respondents' anticipated motion to dismiss, and counsel for respondents shall address their position on the issue that trial counsel failed to file petitioner's notice of appeal in light of Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000). Counsel shall file the statement within fourteen days from the date of this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen days from the date of this order, counsel for respondents shall file a supplemental statement. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.


Summaries of

Vasquez v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-3141 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Vasquez v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:ZEFERINO ORTIZ VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3141 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)