From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 27, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv21 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv21

03-27-2019

JACOB VASQUEZ, #1836138 v. JAMES K. GRAY, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Jacob Vasquez, a prisoner confined at the Gib Lewis Unit within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights lawsuit complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights while housed at the Billy Moore Unit. The case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge, the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition of the case.

On February 4, 2019, Judge Mitchell issued a Report, (Dkt. #20), recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. #13), be granted, in part, and denied in part. Specifically, Judge Mitchell recommended that any claim against Defendants for monetary damages in their official capacities should be dismissed with prejudice; however, she also recommended that the remainder of the motion to dismiss be denied and that Plaintiff Vasquez's deliberate indifference claims remain before the court.

Plaintiff Vasquez has filed an objection to the Report, (Dkt. #23). The court has conducted a careful de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations to which the Plaintiff objected. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) (District Judge shall "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made."). Upon such de novo review, the court has determined that the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge is correct and the Plaintiff's objections are without merit. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections, (Dkt. #23), are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #20), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Further, it is

ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Dkt. #13), is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Claims against Defendants for monetary damages in their official capacities are DISMISSED with prejudice. In all other respects, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff Vasquez's deliberate indifference claims remain before the court.

SIGNED this the 27th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vasquez v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Mar 27, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv21 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Vasquez v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:JACOB VASQUEZ, #1836138 v. JAMES K. GRAY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv21 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2019)