From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. Fulton

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Dec 20, 2021
No. CIV-21-932-J (W.D. Okla. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-932-J

12-20-2021

FELIX VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. TREA FULTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BERNARD M. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging his constitutional rights were violated during his arrest. [Doc. No. 1]. Plaintiff also filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [Doc. No. 2]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). Judge Purcell ordered Plaintiff to cure deficiencies in his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and cautioned Plaintiff that failure to respond could result in dismissal of the action. [Doc. Nos. 5, 6, 8]. Plaintiff failed to do so, and Judge Purcell recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. [Doc. No. 9]. Plaintiff did not object and has waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9], DENIES Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2], and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. No. 1] without prejudice.

A separate judgment will issue.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vasquez v. Fulton

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Dec 20, 2021
No. CIV-21-932-J (W.D. Okla. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Vasquez v. Fulton

Case Details

Full title:FELIX VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. TREA FULTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-932-J (W.D. Okla. Dec. 20, 2021)