The Court thus declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. See Vasquez v. City of San Jose, 634 F.Supp.3d 712, 733 (N.D. Cal. 2022), aff'd, No. 22-16691, 2024 WL 445320 (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 2024); see also City of Colton v. Am. Promotional Events, Inc.-W., 614 F.3d 998, 1008 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding that the district court acted within its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after granting summary judgment on all federal claims).
The seriousness and potentially ongoing nature of these crimes, Defendants argue, support Zech's decision to use deadly force. See Vasquez v. City of San Jose, 634 F.Supp.3d 712, 722 (N.D. Cal. 2022), aff'd, No. 2216691, 2024 WL 445320 (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 2024) (citing Garner, 471 U.S. at 11-12) (“An officer who has probable cause may prevent a fleeing suspect's escape using deadly force.”).