From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vartanpour v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 20, 2020
457 P.3d 970 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 80487

02-20-2020

Rafik VARTANPOUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Rafik Vartanpour Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Rafik Vartanpour

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for an order directing the district court clerk to issue a presentence investigation report to appellant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State , 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Vartanpour v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 20, 2020
457 P.3d 970 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Vartanpour v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAFIK VARTANPOUR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 20, 2020

Citations

457 P.3d 970 (Nev. 2020)