Varner v. Shepard

150 Citing cases

  1. Garcia v. White

    5:21-cv-226-RH/MJF (N.D. Fla. Jun. 6, 2023)

    Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 638 (2016); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211 (2007); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021).

  2. Garcia v. White

    5:21-cv-226-RH/MJF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2024)

    The PLRA requires “proper exhaustion.” Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1260 (11th Cir. 2021).

  3. Stallworth v. Wilkins

    5:17-cv-306-MCR-MJF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 10, 2024)

    Exhaustion of such remedies is a mandatory precondition to filing a lawsuit. Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021).

  4. Garcia v. Alvarez

    5:21-cv-226-RH/MJF (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2024)

    The PLRA requires “proper exhaustion.” Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1260 (11th Cir. 2021). “Proper exhaustion ‘means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly '”

  5. Browning v. Cook

    5:20-cv-299-RV/MJF (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2022)

    Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 638 (2016); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211 (2007); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021).

  6. Helvey v. Jones

    5:22-cv-299-TKW-MJF (N.D. Fla. Jul. 1, 2024)

    Exhaustion of such remedies is a mandatory precondition to filing a lawsuit. Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1257-58 (11th Cir. 2021).

  7. Allen v. Wilkerson

    4:22-cv-148-WS/MJF (N.D. Fla. Feb. 6, 2024)   Cited 2 times

    The PLRA requires “proper exhaustion.” Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1260 (11th Cir. 2021). “Proper exhaustion ‘means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly ....'”

  8. Grantley v. Rollins

    5:22-cv-54-TKW-MJF (N.D. Fla. Aug. 16, 2023)

    Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 638 (2016); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211 (2007); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021).

  9. Garcia v. White

    5:21-cv-226-RH/MJF (N.D. Fla. Mar. 21, 2023)

    Exhaustion of such remedies is a mandatory precondition to suit. Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 638 (2016); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211 (2007); Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021).

  10. Johnson v. Shuler

    4:22-cv-64-MW/MJF (N.D. Fla. Nov. 18, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    “Baked into” this exhaustion requirement is an exception: “[a]n inmate need exhaust only such administrative remedies as are ‘available.'” Varner v. Shepard, 11 F.4th 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2021) (quoting Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 648 (2016)), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 1172 (2022). In other words, “an inmate is required to exhaust those, but only those, grievance procedures that are ‘capable of use' to obtain ‘some relief for the action complained of.'” Id.