From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Varnado v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:19-cv-02285-CKD-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02285-CKD-P

11-29-2022

ELLITON JAY-TWAN VARNADO,[1] Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN,[2] Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed an answer and lodged documents relevant to the petition, but the lodged documents are incomplete. In particular, respondent has omitted RT, vol. 3, pp. 589-647 from the lodged documents and mistakenly filed a duplicative copy of Appellant's Opening Brief in its place. (ECF Nos. 12 & 12-8.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent expand the record in this case by lodging Volume 3 of the Reporter's Transcript (pp. 589-647) in accordance with Rule 7(a) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 within 14 days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Varnado v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:19-cv-02285-CKD-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Varnado v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:ELLITON JAY-TWAN VARNADO,[1] Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN,[2] Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-02285-CKD-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)