From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vargas v. Horn

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:23-cv-00201-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00201-MCS-PD

01-31-2024

JOSE DOLORES VARGAS, Petitioner, v. PATWIN HORN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

MARK C. SCARSI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). No objections to the Report were filed. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is denied with prejudice.

Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2020).


Summaries of

Vargas v. Horn

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:23-cv-00201-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Vargas v. Horn

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DOLORES VARGAS, Petitioner, v. PATWIN HORN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00201-MCS-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)