Opinion
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00205
11-04-2021
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
DAVIE S. MORALES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), entered on October 20, 2021. (D.E. 10). The M&R recommends that Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against Defendants be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). (D.E. 10). The M&R further recommends that the dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (D.E. 10). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the M&R on November 1, 2021. (D.E. 11).
First, Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's handling of aspects of this case. (D.E. 11). The Magistrate Judge is permitted to resolve all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters without the parties' consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636. Accordingly, this objection is OVERRULED.
Next, Plaintiff objects to the M&R's conclusion that his claim is frivolous, and that it should be counted as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 636, by re-arguing the merits of his § 1983 claim. For the same reasons laid out in the M&R, these objections are OVERRULED.
Thus, after having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiffs objections were directed, the Court OVERRULES 1 Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10).
(2) Plaintiffs complaint (D.E. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).
(3) This dismissal is counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at . ThreeStrikes@txs.uscourts.gov.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
SO ORDERED.