Opinion
Civil Action 1:21-00084-KD-M
09-14-2022
KONSTANTINOS VARESIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH LANDRY, Defendant.
VERDICT
1. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Michael Joseph Landry acted in self-defense?
YES___ NO X
If you answered “yes”, then sign, date, and return the Verdict Form.
If you answered “no”, then proceed to Question 2.
NEGLIGENCE
2. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Michael Joseph Landry was negligent, and that his negligence proximately caused Konstantinos Varesis' injuries?
YES X NO___
If you answered “yes”, then answer Question 3.
If you answered “no”, then do not answer Question 3 and proceed to Question 4.
3. Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Konstantinos Varesis was negligent and that his negligence proximately contributed to his own injury?
YES _X NO___
WANTONNESS
4. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Michael Joseph Landry consciously acted or failed to act with a reckless or conscious disregard of the rights or safety of Konstantinos Varesis, and was aware that harm would likely or probably result?
YES X NO___
If you found that Landry's conduct was negligent (and Varesis was not negligent) or if you found that Landry's conduct was wanton, continue to Question 5. Otherwise, sign and date this Verdict Form.
DAMAGES
5. What amount of compensatory damages will fairly and reasonably compensate Konstantinos Varesis for his injuries?
Physical injury, pain, suffering, and mental anguish $ ___
6. If you answered “yes” to Question 4, do you find by clear and convincing evidence that Konstantinos Varesis should be awarded punitive damages?
YES, in the amount of $ 2000 NO___
7. Do you find that Michael Joseph Landry intended to cause severe injury to Konstantinos Varesis?
YES___ NO X
Please sign and date this Verdict Form. SO SAY WE ALL,