From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vardy Holding Co. v. Metric Resales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 8, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, that the plaintiff was not entitled to an award of attorneys' fees in the judgments of foreclosure. In this case, the mortgages provided, in pertinent part, for the award of attorneys' fees in actions other than to foreclose the mortgages. The promissory notes evidencing the underlying obligations provided, in relevant part, for attorneys' fees to be awarded "[i]f this note be not paid when due". "That provision in the note[s] is not the equivalent of an obligation to pay reasonable counsel fees in an action to foreclose a mortgage" (see, Lipton v Specter, 96 A.D.2d 549, lv denied 61 N.Y.2d 608). Accordingly, the applications for attorneys' fees in these foreclosure proceedings were properly denied. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vardy Holding Co. v. Metric Resales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 1987
131 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Vardy Holding Co. v. Metric Resales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VARDY HOLDING CO., Appellant, v. METRIC RESALES, INC., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Watertown Savings Bank v. Delaney

As a general rule, counsel fees are recoverable in a foreclosure action if the agreement authorizes them (…

Vacation Vlg. Homeowners' Assn. v. Mordkofsky

Thus, where the contract provided that the defendant would be liable for counsel fees incurred in an action…