Opinion
949 CA 16–02192
03-16-2018
Ann VANYO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BUFFALO POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., and City of Buffalo, Defendants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)
JAMES OSTROWSKI, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. CREIGHTON, JOHNSEN & GIROUX, BUFFALO (IAN HAYES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT BUFFALO POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC. TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT CITY OF BUFFALO.
JAMES OSTROWSKI, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT.
CREIGHTON, JOHNSEN & GIROUX, BUFFALO (IAN HAYES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT BUFFALO POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC.
TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT CITY OF BUFFALO.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERSame memorandum as in Vanyo v. Buffalo Police Benevolent Association, Inc. ( [appeal No. 2] 159 A.D.3d 1448, 73 N.Y.S.3d 827 [Mar. 16, 2018] [4th Dept 2018] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.