Opinion
2014-08-27
In the Matter of Sharon FUCHS, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph ITZKOWITZ, et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.
Reported below, 120 A.D.3d 682, 991 N.Y.S.2d 324.
Motion for leave to appeal denied.
The Court of Appeals restates the rule that the denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value ( see Matter of Marchant v. Mead–Morris Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297–298, 169 N.E. 386 [1929] ).