From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vann v. Winders

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1922
113 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1922)

Opinion

(Filed 11 October, 1922.)

Appeal and Error — Homestead — Judgment — Incomplete Appeal.

On this appeal from an allotment of a homestead by the judgment debtor, it appears that the record failed to show a signed judgment, and the appeal is incomplete.

APPEAL by defendant from Lyon, J., at February Term, 1922, of SAMPSON.

Butler Herring for plaintiff.

John D. Kerr, Sr., for defendant.


Exceptions to allotment of homestead and personal property exemptions filed by the defendant before the clerk of the Superior Court and transferred by him to the civil issue docket.

From a judgment overruling the defendant's exceptions, this appeal is prosecuted.


This was a proceeding under C. S., 740, in which the judgment debtor, defendant herein, being dissatisfied with the valuation and allotment of his homestead and personal property exemptions, as assessed by the appraisers in an execution, undertook to have the same set aside and vacated for alleged irregularities in the returns.

It is stated in the record that "after a hearing, the defendant's exceptions were overruled, defendant excepted and appealed," but there was no order or judgment signed by the judge; at least, none appears on the record. The record seems to be incomplete. Logan v. Harris, 90 N.C. 7. However, we have examined the defendant's exceptions and find them to be without merit. No error has been shown.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Vann v. Winders

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1922
113 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1922)
Case details for

Vann v. Winders

Case Details

Full title:HENRY VANN v. J. B. WINDERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1922

Citations

113 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1922)
113 S.E. 927

Citing Cases

Seip v. Wright

The result is that there was no error in the decision of the court. Affirmed. Cited: Sanders v. Ins. Co., 183…