From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vann v. Vandenbrook

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 1, 2009
09-cv-007-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 1, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-007-bbc.

June 1, 2009


MEMORANDUM


On May 29, 2009, I screened plaintiff's amended complaint and allowed him to proceed on his Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference against defendant Bittleman, who was previously a John Doe defendant. Now it has come to my attention that I did not order that defendant Bittleman be served with plaintiff's amended complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to an informal service agreement between the Attorney General and this court, copies of plaintiff's amended complaint and the May 29 order are being sent today to the Attorney General for service on defendant Bittleman.


Summaries of

Vann v. Vandenbrook

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 1, 2009
09-cv-007-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Vann v. Vandenbrook

Case Details

Full title:BARRY ANTHONY VANN, Plaintiff, v. MIKE VANDENBROOK, R.N. STEVE HELGERSON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 1, 2009

Citations

09-cv-007-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 1, 2009)