From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vann v. Hartsuck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 23, 2012
No. CV 11-0469-TUC-JGZ (BPV) (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-0469-TUC-JGZ (BPV)

10-23-2012

Charles Vann, Petitioner, v. Keith Hartsuck, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco recommending dismissal of the Petition as moot. (Doc. 18.)

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Velasco's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted.
(2) Petitioner's §2254 habeas petition (Doc. 6) is dismissed as moot.
(3) A Certificate of Appealability is denied and shall not issue.

(4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter.

______________

Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vann v. Hartsuck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 23, 2012
No. CV 11-0469-TUC-JGZ (BPV) (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Vann v. Hartsuck

Case Details

Full title:Charles Vann, Petitioner, v. Keith Hartsuck, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-0469-TUC-JGZ (BPV) (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2012)