From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanhoose v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jan 20, 1967
410 S.W.2d 623 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

January 20, 1967.

Lee Thomas Vanhoose, pro se.

Robert Baldridge, pro se.


Lee Thomas Vanhoose and Robert Baldridge, presently incarcerated in the penitentiary at Eddyville pursuant to a judgment of the Johnson Circuit Court, seek an order of mandamus requiring the Judge of the Johnson Circuit Court to order prepared the transcript of record on an RCr 11.42 motion which was overruled by that court.

Petitioners allege they have taken the proper steps to perfect an appeal from the judgment overruling their motion. Respondent has been notified of this proceeding and has made no response. The allegations of the petition consequently must be treated as confessed and the petition granted.

The petition for mandamus is granted, and the respondent is directed to cause a transcript of the record of the proceedings made under the RCr 11.42 motion to be filed with the Clerk of this court and a duplicate copy forwarded to petitioners.


Summaries of

Vanhoose v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jan 20, 1967
410 S.W.2d 623 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Vanhoose v. Sparks

Case Details

Full title:Lee Thomas VANHOOSE and Robert Baldridge, Petitioners, v. Hon. W. D…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jan 20, 1967

Citations

410 S.W.2d 623 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)