From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VANG v. WALKER

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0704 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0704 FCD GGH P.

December 1, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On November 1, 2010, this court denied his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's August 24, 2010 findings and recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 30, 2010.


Summaries of

VANG v. WALKER

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
No. CIV S-09-0704 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)
Case details for

VANG v. WALKER

Case Details

Full title:COMDY VANG, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0704 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)