Opinion
1:23-cv-00447-ADA-SKO
03-27-2023
DAVID VANG, Plaintiff, v. GEIL ENTERPRISES INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 2)
SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff David Vang, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on March 23, 2023, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2.) The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915, and the request to proceed in forma pauperis shall be granted.
As to the status of the complaint, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must conduct an initial review of every pro se complaint proceeding in forma pauperis to determine whether it is legally sufficient under the applicable pleading standards. The Court must dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, if the Court determines that the complaint is legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the Court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies in the complaint can be cured by amendment. Plaintiff's complaint will be screened in due course.
If appropriate after the case has been screened, the Clerk of Court will provide Plaintiff with the requisite forms and instructions to request the assistance of the United States Marshal in serving Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
Based on the forgoing and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.