Vandyke v. Carleton

2 Citing cases

  1. Bailey v. Cooper

    111 A. 271 (N.H. 1920)   Cited 2 times

    It was the duty of the firm to pay the tax on his horses, and his duty as a partner to see that it was paid. VanDyke v. Carleton, 61 N.H. 574, 579. Hence his lumber was liable to be taken in satisfaction of the tax on the firm property. P.S., c. 60, s. 10.

  2. Canaan v. Grafton County

    64 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1888)

    Whether the mistake in the name was accidental or intentional, it did not invalidate the tax. Sawyer v. Gleason, 59 N.H. 140; Van Dyke v. Carleton, 61 N.H. 574. The error was one of form merely, and the assessment appears to have been satisfactory to McCormick from his payment of the taxes without objection; and the town having made the assessment in that form, and having collected and appropriated the taxes of 1873 and 1874, ought not now to be permitted to question the validity of the assessment.