Opinion
5:24-cv-00715-SSS-SHKx
06-07-2024
Kristian Annette Vandiver v. Petsmart, LLC, et al.
Present The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL
Proceedings: ZOOM HEARING RE: DEFENDANT PETSMART, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. 15]; DEFENDANT HAECKEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. 16]; & PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. 17]
Counsel state their appearances. The Court confers with counsel and hears oral argument. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Riverside County Superior Court. [Dkt. 17].
2. Defendant Petsmart, LLC's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. [Dkt. 15].
3. Defendant Haeckel's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. [Dkt. 16].
IT IS SO ORDERED.